|
I
National Conference of football supporters
The
play of verbal violence in football
Jesús
Castañón Rodríguez
The
eternal problem of violence in football is something as old as the
play itself. It has given literary signs since 1925, when Enrique
Jardiel Poncela published the one-act farce "El once del Amaniel
FC" in the magazine Aire Libre. This club in the "El once
del Amaniel FC" was the one which played with the agility of
a pessimistic rhinoceros to whom was reckoned eleven and then it
was given seven. It was a club that thought "the honour of
the association is the leite motives of the existence, and before
an affirmation that kind I lose my head and the automatic lighter",
according to its president. And in order not to lose honour, he
planned tactics kicking in the shin, thumping with the ball in the
nostrils, also by means of strong loads, elbowing people's stomachs,
trodding on people's feet
to the extent of players gave the
chairs kicks to train when they were going to go out.
In
1988, and according to some surveys, it was the sixth factor that
caused violent arguments, the second element that had tendency to
end up fighting and the first one that cause violent attitudes too.
Football
as a scope for violence
For
the new framework of consumers of feelings, because this is what
the fans have become in, we must emphasize that in football a new
match is contested, felt as a magic experience, between three different
and close aspects which are interwoven in an amazing way: passion,
aggressiveness and violence strictly speaking.
It's
a match where passion is understood as chaotic spirits, as a very
lively preference for something and as vehement hobby. Aggressiveness
comes into football as decision-making ability for an action, as
a possible tendency to offend or as a fact which implies provocation
or attack. And violence includes actions out of a natural mood or
condition, what means impetus and strength, what is done abruptly,
actions against taste, pleasure, facts out of reason and justice,
embarrassing situations (for example when Tamudo scored a goal against
Toni in the final of "Copa del Rey") and the impetuous
temper which allows itself to be persuaded by anger.
So,
it's practically impossible to put an end to violence in football,
but it's possible to fight intensely against its signs by means
of rage or without listening to reason or justice and reducing the
fateful circumstances. We may work in order to improve the behaviour
linked to the three football scopes where there is any kind of exacerbate
violence:
1º)
The play, together with direct competitions related to players,
trainers and references.
2º)
The offices, with the use of a psychological violence which wants
to intimidate to persuade in a different negotiations and to get
better results.
3º)
The row of seats, in the broad sense of the term, fans and mass
media try to influence on the results by means of pressure.
Causes
So,
football has an innate violent behaviour but regulated and another
associated violence which has come out to the side-line to get worried
all sports stratums and authorities: cruelty above all, among the
spectators.
Its
possible causes have been analyzed and we may come to the conclusion
that it affects two scopes. First, regarding the play, violence
developed in the pitch stimulates the spectators' aggressive behaviour.
So, taking into account the surveys carried out by the AFE in 1988
and 1992 it was concluded that this violence was due to managers
who accept it, trainers who prefer to select the most violent football
players and due to referees because of their bad training, their
consent of aggressive actions to the local team and finally due
to the inadequate system of designation.
And
second, as far as the row of seats are concerned, there're two phenomena.
For the spectators, it has been concluded that provocative placards
may produce violence. And in a survey organized by the Spanish Real
Federation of Football in 1991, and between the fans it was concluded
that violence is not generated by football but society and it emphasized
as people to blame: referees, football players, fans, the Federation
itself, journalists, presidents and trainers.
The
mass-media are accused of resorting to violence and heroic values
as a lure to catch spectator's attention, together with transforming
a simple competition into a passion show. And sports advertising
stimulates an exacerbate materialism and in occasions, it has pulled
off a good deal because of violence by means of products like the
video "Tarjeta roja" where some images are recreated,
one of the most striking ones based on violent and foul play.
Solutions
In
the last two decades several solutions have been proposed: to extend
the goals to diminish the slow cadence of goals; the presence of
a fourth referee and the change of the colour of the referee's uniform,
those men in black and bad-wishes; the referees' professionalism
and the change of the designation systems; the hardening of the
penalties in the rules to pursue the violent play; to remove the
barriers of the stadiums to avoid the sensation of the spectators
of being like in a cage, to remove the location to be standing up;
the bettering of the stadiums security
All
these measures have been developed, since 198, from the European
Agreement about violence in sport, in the section number 66 of Law
based on Sport in 1990 and in the section 12th of the Juridical
Regulations of the Sports Anonymous Societies (1).
The
risks of verbal violence
The
bettering of behaviours comprises actions based on prohibition,
prevention and alternative ways. So far, it has been paid more attention
to the first two ones than to the third one.
The
panorama is complex because for some supporters football is useful
to express an identification, give a new meaning to their life and
improve their esteem to the extent of becoming something typical
of them; something which deserves somebody fights for it and something
that may replace family or partner.
Football
relieves frustrations and takes in everybody organizing its supporters
into sympathizers or fans according to the level of feelings, emotions,
sufferings or ways of reacting with which they enjoy football. It's
a sentimental and vehement experience that shows us positive values
based on tributes, obligations, faithfulness, superiority or perseverance;
and also based on the negation of the existence of the opposing,
jokes or establishment of social differences. It's an experience
based on "Love-spirit-courage" to be favourable to self-esteem
and "Threat- insult" in view of the possibility of losing
the identity.
At
this point it's where some factors come into play such as the seduction
of words and the possible risks to fade away frontiers between aggressiveness,
passion and violence.
So
far, the preventive measures have taken into account that they couldn't
take part into the Cabinet of Administration people who have been
penalized for being favourable to certain behaviours, attitudes
together with aggressive and unsporting gestures of football players
when they go over to the referee, other players or the spectators
as well as for making public statements that urge their teams or
spectators to be violent with managers, trainers, referees, sportsmen
or members.
However
verbal violence has been able to find a sphere in speculation of
sense of football environment, in the springboard for the ideas
and money combinations according to the definition made by the Honour
President of the International Association for a Sport without Violence,
the Prince Rainero of Monaco.
Current
professional football has a resonance box where in the violent language
forms several types of factors may intervene:
1º)
According to some supporters, the stadium is a place of ritual violence
where brutality, insolence and coarseness are basic expressions
which take part in the festival.
2º)
Professional football has created a new frame of reference where
journalist is not only a mere informant but he has to develop functions
as educator, adviser of the information and commercial mediator.
It's in the middle of the spectators' passion, the typical violence
of the play, the commercial and advertising frenzy which tries to
get achievements urging to consumption and assimilation of several
events which occur at the same time and the most striking has to
be selected.
3º) There is a generalized tendency to look for expressions
that generate emotions, feelings and impressions of the sports show.
The technical thing is only understandable for those who have taken
part in football, while words with figurative meanings telling what
it looks like are understood by more spectators
4º)
More frequently, when talking about leaders, free verbal attacks
together with unnecessary offences and defamations appear.
5º)
Sometimes main figures make impact statements where many times there
are disqualifications, insults or provocations. Sometimes to put
pressure to get a better result and now and again to catch the spectators'
attention and get a greater activity in order to support them; never
to get a greater economic takings.
6º)
The excesses of fact interpretations and the plays assessment which
occur very fast are usually done with a constant stress and emphasis,
when it should be used only in important occasions. And in this
atmosphere, from time to time, accusations, threats due to this
fear of losing the identity and the boasts fit.
7º)
In the social presentation of football, the myth of success predominates
together with the local passions, if this is not so, tension sources
appear. Sometimes, it has been curious the fact that it has been
celebrated as a triumph the fact of losing a match or demoting.
8º)
The last factor has to do with the typical matter based on the warmongering
football language. Fortunately, this characteristic is less obvious
in football and it has its own history. The spreading of football
around the middle of the century fell to the military world, which
not having terminology in the different languages told about football
by means of the one it has handy: shot, howitzer, artilleryman,
cannon shots, etc. This war language did helped to form a mood tending
towards discipline, working as a team, the dedication to achieve
an aim, but within the whole of football words it occupies a low
percentage.
The
work by Julián García Candau is very recommendable
to be read about this aspect and also a book which will appear soon,
La Seducción de las Palabras, written by Álex Grijelmo.
The
mixture of all these aspects and the exacerbation of sports passion,
the commercial frenzy and the associated feelings and values is
what make the spectators fade away the boundaries between the necessary
aggressiveness, passion and violence within the ground.
The
leap from the violence forms of the ground and the offices to the
tiers, the lack of inhibition of the people when they act in group,
the fact of showing the wins as a praise of the lack of control
and the defeats as a conflict makes violence may live between the
spectators with face to face confrontations, and only in exceptional
cases against the other football levels.
When
several forms based on aggressiveness, passion and violence act
at the same time, some people react in mass and situations related
to passionate wars where everything is accepted appear: attacks
on people and destructions in the stadiums; savagery, murders, disturbances
and actions against the football players' interests out of the stadiums.
Epilogue
To
sum up, verbal violence also takes part in football environment
and it can help other forms which are less desirable are present
too thanks to its charming capacity. I wish the fans- in the new
football frame as an industry based on leisure where they carry
out the function of consumers with feelings- would keep promoting
that football is only a show, a business or an entertainment, which
is " the landing of the stairs of the week", according
to the poet Carlos Murciano it's the country where people can forget
disillusions, the break which keeps on giving freedom, dreams, calm
As Jardiel Poncela would say "I wish that by means of the fans'
help football doesn't lose neither its head over nor the automatic
lighter".
Notes
(1)
Cf. European agreement about violence, 1987.
The article number 66 of the Law 19/1990, on the 15th of October
about sport alludes to the prohibition of putting on show placards,
symbols and emblems which urge to violence. The article number 12th
of the Royal Decree 1084/1991 on the 5th of July about the Legal
Regulation of Sports Anonymous Societies establishes that there
are certain people who can't take part of the Board of Directors,
these are the ones who have been penalized because of the fact of
favouring aggressive and unsporting behaviours, attitudes and gestures
of some footballers when they head for the referee, other football
players or the spectators, as well as making public statements which
urge to their teams or spectators to violence on managers, trainers,
referees, sportsmen or members.
Bibliographical
references
CONSEJO
DE EUROPA, Convenio Europeo sobre la violencia, 1987.
DEAN,
Paul, "Ira en las gradas", El País, Madrid, 10
de diciembre de 1990.
GÁNDARA,
Lelia, "Las voces del fútbol. Análisis del discurso
y cantos de cancha", Lecturas: Educación Física
y Deportes número 17, Buenos Aires, 1999.
GARCÍA
CANDAU, Julián, El fútbol sin ley, Madrid, Penthatlon,
1980.
GARCÍA
CANDAU, Julián, Épica y lírica del fútbol,
Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1996.
GARCÍA
FERRANDO, Mauel-PUIG BARATA, Núria-LAGARDERA OTERO, Francisco
(Compiladores), Sociología del deporte, Madrid, Alianza Editorial,
1999.
GRIJELMO,
Álex, La seducción de las palabras, Madrid, 2000.
JARDIEL
PONCELA, Enrique, "El once del Amaniel FC", Aire Libre,
Madrid, 1925.
Ley
19/1990, de 15 de octubre, sobre el deporte
MIGUEL,
Amando de, "Propuesta para reducir la violencia en el fútbol",
El Norte de Castilla, Valladolid, 8 de junio de 1985.
MURCIANO,
Carlos, "Paréntesis", en El maravilloso mundo del
fútbol, Madrid, Cosmos, 1976, pág. 182.
NÚÑEZ,
Josep Lluis, "Medidas para devolver la tranquilidad a los estadios",
El País, Madrid, 4 de enero de 1989.
Real
Decreto 1084/1991, de 5 de julio, sobre el Reglamento Jurídico
de las Sociedades Anónimas Deportivas
ROMERO,
Amílcar, "Apuntes sobre la violencia en el fútbol
argentino", Lecturas: Educación Física y Deportes
número 8, Buenos Aires, 1997.
STEINBERG,
Víctor, "Los españoles, cada vez más violentos",
Cambio 16 número 827, Madrid, 1987.
Días
previos al Congreso
17
de junio: Reseña de ponencias y mesa redonda
18
de junio: Reseña de actos en Oviedo
"Fútbol
sí, violencia no", por Pipo Prendes
Traducción:
María Elena Martín Pérez
|